Glamping brands often require guests to upload IDs, verify identity for remote check-in, and store payment tokens for add-on experiences, creating a rich data set attackers covet: payment credentials, personal identifiers, reservation histories, and identity documents. Unlike many traditional hotels, glamping sites often lack on-site IT staff or centralized management, making identity data easier to target when access controls are weak. Misused credentials, phishing, and other identity-centric actions remain among the dominant initial access vectors in breaches—including in cloud environments—and often rank at or near the top compared with causes such as lost devices or physical intrusions.4
How to keep the glam in glamping: Enforce identity governance, require multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all administrative access, and regularly audit permissions to limit credential misuse across staff, vendors, and guests.
Smart-cabin features—digital locks, app-based thermostats, lighting controls, and environmental sensors—elevate the glamping experience with convenience and personalization. Many of these devices also rely on AI-powered automation to tailor lighting, temperature, and comfort settings—adding to the guest experience but expanding the digital footprint operators must protect. In hospitality, guests who experience highly personalized stays rate satisfaction at 9.2 out of 10, compared with 6.1 when personalization is low,⁵ and glamping sites increasingly rely on connected devices to deliver that same elevated touch. But every device added to a tent, cabin, yurt, or tiny home also becomes another node in the attack surface…
How to keep the glam in glamping: Inventory every device, isolate IoT systems from guest and operational networks, and continuously monitor for unusual behavior before attackers can exploit smart-cabin technology.
Remote properties rely on wireless bridges, mesh networks, and long-range repeaters to extend connectivity across wooded or mountainous terrain. These networks are often stitched together over time and rarely monitored continuously. Slow backhaul or intermittent connectivity doesn’t just impact the guest experience—it delays patching, disrupts monitoring tools, and creates blind spots attackers can exploit.
How to keep the glam in glamping: Segment networks by function, deploy monitoring built for low-connectivity environments, and ensure security and networking equipment receive updates even when bandwidth is limited.
Glamping properties depend on third-party platforms for nearly everything—reservations, payment processing, event bookings, shuttle scheduling, retail purchases, and activity management. Each integration becomes an extension of the operator’s attack surface. According to IBM’s Cost of a Data Breach 2024, incidents involving third-party vendors cost 19 percent more on average, driven by complex remediation and shared responsibility models.6
How to keep the glam in glamping: Map every vendor handling guest data, continuously evaluate their security posture, and monitor API behavior to detect unauthorized access before it spreads across your environment.
The quiet of the forest doesn’t translate to safety online. Cybercriminals don’t care how far a tent is from the nearest cell tower—only that the property holds payment information, identity data, and digital access keys worth stealing. Remote properties also face additional risks, including seasonal staff turnover, shared devices and credentials, inconsistent access-control hygiene, and limited on-site tech support. These gaps make “rustic luxury” an increasingly attractive target for attackers looking for soft-entry points.
How to keep the glam in glamping: Adopt a Zero Trust approach, validate every user and device interaction, and monitor activity across your digital footprint to reduce exposure in remote, lightly staffed locations.